Quick Picks for Project Management Software

  • Teamwork – Best for client-facing agencies needing robust billing and time tracking integration.
  • Jira – Ideal for software development teams who require powerful issue tracking and agile methodology support.
  • Asana – Great for general project tracking with flexible workflows and easy onboarding.
  • ClickUp – All-in-one customizable platform suited for teams seeking a highly configurable workspace.
  • Basecamp – Simple, straightforward collaboration, best for small, non-technical teams.

When Project Management Software Makes Sense

Project management tools are essential when team coordination, task visibility, and deadline accountability become complex enough to exceed what email or spreadsheets can handle. They shine in environments needing clear task ownership, progress tracking, and often an audit trail of decisions and deliverables. For software engineers, this might mean an agile sprint board with issue tracking, while client services might prioritize time logging and invoicing tied to projects.

The choice of tool usually boils down to team size, workflows, industry, and integration needs. This is where comparing Teamwork and Jira becomes particularly relevant — both serve project management but cater to somewhat distinct user bases and expectations.

Teamwork vs Jira: A Deeper Dive Into Features and Workflows

Target Users and Team Fit:

  • Teamwork primarily targets agencies, consulting firms, and professional services with needs for client billing, time tracking, and project financial monitoring. It’s very effective for teams servicing multiple external clients simultaneously.
  • Jira is built for software development teams managing project iterations, bug tracking, and release management, with comprehensive agile tools such as Scrum and Kanban boards.

Task and Project Views:

  • Teamwork offers classic task lists, Gantt charts, and a straightforward calendar view. Its interface emphasizes hierarchy: projects contain multiple tasks with nested subtasks, making it easier to map out deliverables relative to external client contracts.
  • Jira excels with customizable boards—Scrum and Kanban—and integrates deeply with developer workflows (e.g., linking commits, branches, pull requests). It also allows complex issue types beyond "tasks," like bugs, epics, stories, and subtasks, promoting granular tracking.

Time Tracking and Billing:

  • Teamwork includes built-in time tracking tied directly to tasks and projects, with invoice generation based on logged hours—a critical feature for agencies with client billing.
  • Jira lacks native billing but supports time tracking through marketplace add-ons, which means extra setup and potential additional costs.

Integrations and Extensibility:

  • Teamwork integrates well with payment platforms, Slack, CRM tools, and Google Workspace, focusing on agency workflows.
  • Jira boasts one of the most extensive ecosystems; integration with Bitbucket, Confluence (for documentation), GitHub, build/deploy tools, and countless plugins cater to technical teams.

User Experience:

  • Teamwork’s UI is intuitive for project managers accustomed to traditional task management. The learning curve is moderate but manageable for non-developers.
  • Jira’s interface can be overwhelming initially, especially for non-engineering stakeholders, due to its rich feature set and configuration options.

Where It Shines and Where It Struggles

Teamwork

Where it shines:

  • Client billing and time-tracking integration tailored for agencies.
  • Clear task hierarchies with easy client access permissions.
  • Traditional project views that non-technical users find approachable.

Where it struggles:

  • Limited agile/sprint-specific features for development teams.
  • Less flexibility in customizing workflows compared to Jira.
  • Lack of direct developer tool integrations out of the box.

Jira

Where it shines:

  • Robust Agile tools supporting Scrum, Kanban, and other methodologies.
  • Deep integration with software development lifecycle tools.
  • Highly customizable workflows reflect complex development processes.

Where it struggles:

  • Steep learning curve for casual or non-technical users.
  • Requires plugins or third-party tools for client billing/time tracking.
  • Configuration can become time-consuming without dedicated admin resources.

How to Choose: A Simple Checklist and Scoring Rubric

| Criteria | Teamwork (Score 1–5) | Jira (Score 1–5) | |----------------------------------|----------------------|------------------| | Industry fit (Agencies vs Dev) | | | | Need for built-in billing | | | | Agile methodology support | | | | Integration with developer tools | | | | User-friendliness for non-tech | | | | Workflow customization flexibility| | |

Use this checklist by scoring each tool against your priorities. For example:

  • If billing and client visibility > 4, Teamwork will score higher.
  • If Agile boards and developer toolchain are critical, Jira scores higher.
  • If your team spans technical and non-technical roles equally, factor in learning curve and usability.

Realistic Use-Cases

Use Case 1: Digital Marketing Agency
An agency with multiple clients tracks deliverables and billable hours via Teamwork. They use Gantt charts to plan campaign phases and generate invoices automatically based on logged hours. Teamwork’s client permission controls ensure clients see only relevant project details.

Use Case 2: Software Development Team at a SaaS Company
The dev team uses Jira to manage their two-week sprints, utilizing Scrum boards to track story progress. They integrate Jira with Bitbucket for seamless code deployment tracking and use custom workflows to enforce QA stages before release.

FAQ: Common Questions About Teamwork vs Jira

Q1: Can Teamwork be used for software development projects?
Yes, but it lacks many features specific to software development, such as native Agile boards and developer tool integrations, making Jira more suitable.

Q2: Does Jira include billing and time tracking?
Jira does not include native billing; time tracking is available but typically requires add-ons.

Q3: Which is easier to onboard for non-technical teams?
Teamwork generally offers a more intuitive experience for non-technical users.

Q4: Can I migrate tasks between Teamwork and Jira?
Migration requires third-party tools or manual export/import due to different data structures.

Q5: Which tool offers better mobile app functionality?
Both have mobile apps, but Jira’s power-user features can be cumbersome on mobile, whereas Teamwork’s app focuses on simple task management.

Next Steps: Choosing and Implementing Your PM Tool

  1. Identify your core priorities: client billing? Agile development? cross-functional usability?
  2. Score Teamwork and Jira using the checklist above.
  3. Trial each platform with a small team on a pilot project to test real-world fit.
  4. Prepare onboarding materials tailored to your team’s technical comfort and workflows.
  5. Plan integration with your existing tools early to avoid disruption.
  6. Set clear rules for task creation, updates, and status rolling to prevent common pitfalls—particularly in Jira, where complexity can quickly overwhelm.

In sum, your decision between Teamwork and Jira hinges on the nature of your projects and team composition. Agencies focused on client service and billing should lean toward Teamwork, while software teams embedded in Agile development benefit from Jira’s powerful customizations. Neither is perfect for all scenarios but choosing the best fit upfront saves costly process headaches later.

Where to try these tools

  • Teamwork – [Start a free trial]({{ AFFILIATE_LINK_TEAMWORK }})

Related guides